Anyway. Obama is endorsing Weisner. Interesting for the fact that Weisner once describied the endorsements that Irvin was getting from people who don't live in Aurora as...
"glib support of highly partisan politicians who don't even live in Aurora."
I guess Obama isn't highly partisan and secretly lives in town? Or is it cool when someone with a big name endoreses you Tom?
From the Beacon Story
Obama's endorsement goes against statements the freshman senator made in Aurora just one month ago, when he said he had "no intention of being a king-maker" in the mayoral election because the people of Aurora "are much closer to the issues and know the gentlemen involved."
At the time, Obama said he was inclined to endorse Weisner because he's a Democrat, but he also congratulated Richard Irvin for his second-place finish in the Feb. 22 primary election and called him "a fine young man as well."
Dan Shomon, Obama's political director, said the freshman senator is backing Weisner because he's a progressive Democrat who supported Obama in November and has a lifelong record of community and public service.
Shomon said Obama never said he wouldn't endorse a candidate for mayor.
"The endorsement is not against Irvin, it's for Weisner," Shomon said. "Irvin has also mounted a credible campaign."
-- So besides the label of 'progressive Democrat' AKA Liberal this endorsement should help, but it makes Tom look like a hypocrite on the endorsement thing.
Looking forward to reading the anonymous comments telling me how an Obama endorsement is different than a Tom Cross endorsement and how 'Progressive Democrat' is going to play well.
OneMan